The objective of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is to measure ” patients’ initial function, ongoing progress, and outcome” for a wide range of. Free online Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) calculator. Home / Free Visual score (%): Lower Extremity Function Score: 80 / 80, Percentage: %. Purpose. The test can be used to evaluate the impairment of a patient with lower extremity musculoskeletal condition or disorders. Can be used.
|Published (Last):||18 April 2005|
|PDF File Size:||7.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.89 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We surveyed existing questionnaires. Earlier research has shown that a healthy population does not necessarily score a maximum amount of points on a PROM Schneider and Jurenitsch Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 24 8: The SF has served as the principal generic measure for comparisons with condition-specific wcale.
One approach to overcoming the need for multiple measures of health status in clinical practice is to lefw whether the measurement properties of conditionspecific measures are superior to those of generic measures. This class of ICC is appropriate when ratings are averaged and an adjustment has been applied to address a systematic difference between raters. Journal List Acta Orthop v.
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. In this case, depending on the clinical picture and time frame since the previous assessment, a change in intervention, referral, or discharge of the patient may be considered.
Questions on activity vary from walking between rooms to running on uneven ground. That is, the tabulated score is within 5 points of a patient’s “true” score. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to check for differences in non-parametric outcome variables.
Interpreting lower extremity functional status scores. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function dcale knee replacement surgery.
The LEFS was conceived as a measure applicable to a broad spectrum of lower-extremity problems. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Within Kirshner and Guyatt’s taxonomy, responsiveness exists independent of validity.
Application to Individual Patients.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 10 oct; Continuous variables are presented as mean with standard deviation SD or median with interquartile range IQRas appropriate. J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 39 2: In order to develop a measure that is applicable to a spectrum of conditions and levels of disabilities, the remaining items were selected to represent different difficulty levels, as indicated by item mean scores that were higher and lower than the midpoint. For example, there are numerous condition-specific measures available for people with knee conditions.
Lifting an object, like a bag of groceries from the floor. Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: In order to examine our argument for validity, which specified that patients with acute conditions would demonstrate more functional limitation than patients with chronic conditions, all patients were assigned a chronicity rating on a 3-point scale by 2 orthopedic physical therapists blinded to patients’ functional scale scores. Evaluating changes in health status: Functional outcomes after successful lower extremity arterial injuries repair.
Free online Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) calculator – orthotoolkit
Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: One or more theories are developed, and scwle extent to which a measure yields results concordant with the theory lecs support for the validity of the measure. Men had a slightly higher score than women. Measurement of functional status in our patients served 2 important and distinct purposes: There was no statistically correlation between socioeconomic status and LEFS score, but people who were unfit for work had significantly poorer LEFS scores.
National Center for Biotechnology InformationU.
Normative data for the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)
The broad categories scals orthopedic conditions in this group were: As expected, the LEFS score showed a negative correlation with age; i.
Oxford University Press; Injury ; 43 7: The physical and mental component summary scores represent weighted composite scores derived from the 8 health concept scales.
Patients with acute conditions would demonstrate lower LEFS scores and SF physical function subscale and physical component summary scores than would patients with chronic conditions. The patient’s score is tallied at the bottom of the page. The short-term goal, therefore, could be: Making sharp turns while running fast.
Interpretation of the data: