Jun 28 2020

Thanks to the movie, people tend to assume that they know about John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick: it’s the one where a hammy devil. John Updike is the great genial sorcerer of American letters [and] The Witches of Eastwick [is one of his] most ambitious works [A] comedy. Complete summary of John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick. eNotes plot summaries cover all the significant action of The Witches of Eastwick.

Author: Doura Mugis
Country: Iran
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 16 August 2008
Pages: 231
PDF File Size: 4.4 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.13 Mb
ISBN: 808-1-83098-503-3
Downloads: 71555
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mikakus

The Witches of Eastwick was my first Updike and a wonderful introduction at that. The prose is exquisite, the evocations magnificent and the themes complex and defy analysis.

Just avoid the movie. In the small town of Eastwick, Rhode Island, three women updiie come to possess magical abilities. Dispatched of their husbands while still in their prime; the air and maternal beauty of Eastwick has empowered them.

A eastwck, Jane subsists on giving nohn lessons to school children. Sukie Rougemont, the youngest of the three, writes a column for the local weekly. Her husband now exists only as a placemat. Thirty-eight year old Alexandra slowly reduced her husband to dust. She keeps him in a jar as a souvenir. Persistently self-conscious of her weight, her aging and paranoid about non-existent cancer, Alexandra earns her income sculpting anatomically correct figurines of women in exaggerated proportions.

All three are engaged in unsatisfactory affairs with married men.

The Witches of Eastwick – John Updike | Savidge Reads

The witches are healers and find themselves drawn to men who need them; the juvenile, the desperate, the depressed.

Jane is tge with a workmate; music teacher Raymond Neff. An unctuous, effeminate, tyrannical father of five who, despite their private intimacies, belittles Jane in public. Sullen Alex, has been sleeping with Joe, an Italian-Catholic builder and father of five. The lives of all three, and eventually the whole town, is unsettled and forever altered by the arrival of the mysterious Darryl Van Horne.

Apparently quite wealthy, Van Horne has acquired a local mansion and begun extensive alterations; disturbing local wildlife, installing a laboratory and a ridiculously opulent indoor spa and sauna. Despite his messy manners and tendency to drop backhanded compliments; people are drawn to Van Horne. None more so than the three witches. Previously happy in their occupations, Darryl inspires them to dream beyond their current stations, risking their security.

But mystery continues to surround Van Horne. Where has all his wealth come from? Why are his clothes monogramed with other initials? And which witch is the real wwitches of his affections? That might sound like a strange connection to make. Both novels begin with an established conversation — Pride and Prejudice with a conversation between Mr and Mrs Bennet, The Witches of Eastwick with a conversation between Jane and Alexandra.

Both conversations are of joohn similar topic and have a similar feel; the sudden appearance of a single man of good fortune into their little community with the hint of machinations and prophecy for Mrs Bennet and Alexandra respectively. Whether this is just a coincidence or Updike is consciously having some fun with the reader is something I cannot say. Neither would surprise me. But it did give me a warm first impression and the sense that I was in for a treat.


The prose is exquisite. This novel was a welcome return to a higher class of writing.

The Witches of Eastwick

And yet it is difficult to find a short passage to share what I mean by that here. The elegance cannot be exemplified by sharing a passage of a few sentences as it can in many other books; u;dike they exist in long paragraphs of complementary thoughts and images that piece together a majestic whole.

Some of the best passages seem to have little to do with plot, characterisation or setting; seemingly breaking the rule of eliminating the superfluous; yet you would not want to be spared these pieces. It is playful and teasing as well. Especially as Tbe seems to want to find a use for every term associated with witchcraft — familiar, cosmic order, evil eye, enchantment, cackling — in a non-witchcraft context.

Updike had jogn long interest in the history of witchcraft. He cites a childhood fascination with local witch doctors, to reading Jules Michelet at Harvard and maintaining his interest ever since.

The novel has an interesting structure as well — three parts with no chapters. Longer set-piece scenes are broken up with telephone conversations remember those?

Witches was my first Updike but his witchew preceded my reading of this book. While his writing carries many reputations, the one that his novels were the stuff of infidelity and adultery in small town, middle-class America tthe the particular one I was conscious of. WitchesI had heard, was a departure from this. Witchcraft is the venture, one could say, of women into the realm of power.

What women in the Middle Ages besides witches and queens wielded power that men needed to fear?

The novel has been described as pro-feminist, especially for its time, but I think it would be a mistake to take that conclusion too far. The novel, after all, is not political, it is not a polemic, it is not trying to score points for feminism. Like Sex and the Cityat first glance it can appear to be pro-feminist as it centres on the lives of a few independent women. But in hindsight, also like Sex and the Citythis conclusion is limited as the interests and sources of fulfilment for the women are still centred around the men in their lives.

You could at least argue that Sex and the City was a steppingstone to, say, Girls. It is harder to say something similar for The Witches of Eastwick. Has any other male writer taken up the challenge? Or has the need for one to do so become obsolete? There is plenty in it that could be described as non-feminist or as Updike satirising and poking fun.

Updike teases, and in doing so defies anyone wanting to try and find a consistent theory of the novel. Margaret Attwood, writing at the time, probably put it best:. In other words, it is set right after the counter-cultural bubble has burst — after the events of the Manson murders and the Altamont Free Concert. This setting informs some of the sub-themes of the novel. Updike explores a certain liberal hypocrisy of the time; what liberalism exists in Eastwick is of the high-minded, affluent, New England sort; yet when presented with the prospect of racial integration, available drugs and radical youths; they retreat from their ideals.


Though he finds the courage to leave, his age and churchman status means he is not trusted by the protesting youth. The less said about the film version the better.

The Witches of Eastwick (Eastwick #1) by John Updike

The film seems to have taken the basic premise, but gone on to craft a very different story. It is perhaps a sign of the gap between the literary world and Hollywood in providing for complexity in female characters and their stories.

Not surprisingly, the film also omits virtually all of the sub-plots and their characters. The novel is far darker with the jealousies, vengeances and the harm done to others, both planned and spontaneous. The one thing the film did get right was perhaps the easiest to imagine — casting Jack Nicholson as Van Horne. Reading the novel, it is difficult to imagine anyone other than Nicholson playing the character — charismatic in person but repulsive in manner; offensive in word, but alluring in sentiment.

Having read and enjoyed my first Updike, I am not yet rushing to read any more.

I have a tendency — a bad habit really — of keeping a safe distance from authors I have enjoyed and instead taking risks with authors I have not yet experienced. But with stacks and stacks of other books I have already committed myself to, it may be a while before I get to enjoy him again.

While not of the same volume as the ones I did not read, they do close the gap. The reason I […]. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. November 3, July 27, Jason.

Margaret Attwood, writing at the time, probably put it best: The reason I […] Like Like. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email Address never made public. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: