Mar 21 2020

The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, developed by Swedish researcher Gunnar Borg [1], is a tool for measuring an individual’s. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. The study of human performance and perceived exer tion during physical activity has been an area of con. Perceived exertion in an exergame [12,33] is commonly measured using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale [2, 3], where users rate how hard .

Author: Barisar Arakazahn
Country: Luxembourg
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 11 June 2007
Pages: 151
PDF File Size: 15.80 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.64 Mb
ISBN: 408-5-68280-252-4
Downloads: 61026
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dokree

Rating of perceived exertion – Wikipedia

Sensitization in the UK Supreme Court. The scale is based on the research of Borg, and is sometimes called the Borb Scale. The individual is asked to circle or tick the number that best describes breathlessness, on average, over the last 24 h.

Related articles in Google Scholar. In its simplest terms, it provides a measure of how hard it feels that the body is working based on the phys ical sensations that the subject experiences, including increased heart rate, increased respiration or breathing rate, increased sweating and muscle fatigue [ scqle ].

The Borg scale can be compared to other linear scales such as the Likert scale or a visual analogue scale.

ABOUT contact author info advertising. Post-traumatic growth in ex- military personnel: Can cognitive activities during breaks in repetitive manual work accelerate recovery from fatigue?

Rating of perceived exertion

The RPE Scale is a common method for determining exercise intensity levels. The sensitivity and reproducibility of the results are broadly very similar, although the Borg may outperform the Likert scale in some cases.


Physical exercise Sports science Scales. Aside from accounting for the reduced performance of mentally fatigued participants, this model rationalizes the reduced RPE and hence improved cycling epe trial performance of athletes using a glucose mouthwash Chambers et al.

Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Table

Testing Extra There are scalle fitness testsso it’s not r;e to choose the best one. Clinical usage and validity. This table, based on the research of Gunnar Borg from Stockholm University, is handy for quantifying the intensity of exercise.

This is especially used in clinical diagnosis of breathlessness and dyspnea, chest pain, angina and musculo-skeletal pain. For Permissions, please email: There is a similar scale which has the RPE ratings between 0 and From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. There are several version of this scale. The relationship between rating of sscale exertion and muscle activity during exhaustive constant-load cycling. ABOUT contact author info advertising.

Use our guide to conducting, recording, and interpreting fitness tests. Studies performed in controlled environments have shown a close relationship between perceived physical exertion and work demands expressed as percentage of the individual physical capacity.

Borg Scale – RPE –

The use of the Borg RPE scale either on its own or in combination with other measures, such as the Borg CR10, a Visual Analogue Scale VAS and Likert scales, is widespread across the world in many scientific studies but particularly in the field of sports medicine, where it is used by trainers to plan the intensity of training regimes, and in the workplace, where it is used to assess the exertion used in manual handling and physically active scalf.


A component that appears to integrate many variables during whole-body exercise is the rating of perceived exertion RPE [15].

The scale takes seconds to complete and can be researcher or self-administered and used on a single occasion or multiple times.

Taken from Borg [1]: PAGES home search sitemap store. The following table has the scale between 6 and There are over fitness testsso it’s not easy to choose the best one.

Loneliness and social isolation of military veterans: Work has, however, been undertaken borh Balogh et al. You should consider the validity, reliability, costs and ease of use of each test. They are told to disregard any one factor such as leg pain or shortness of breath but to try to focus on the bkrg feeling of exertion. The sensitivity and reproducibility of the results are broadly similar although work by Grant et al.

There are over fitness testsso it’s not easy to choose the best one.

Participants are asked to rate their exertion on the scale during the activity, combining all sensations and feelings of phys ical stress and fatigue.