ASTM E466-96 PDF

Apr 14 2020

E Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials force~ notched specimens~ unnotched. ASTM E()e1 Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials. Last previous edition approved in as E – 96()?1. DOI: / E 2 Handbook of Fatigue Testing, ASTM STP

Author: Kazrajinn Zululabar
Country: Saudi Arabia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 12 December 2017
Pages: 154
PDF File Size: 8.52 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.48 Mb
ISBN: 922-5-82677-471-6
Downloads: 34057
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Meztigrel

Readers are referred to Ref 1 should this occur. No circumferential machining should be evident when viewed at approximately magni? Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.

The storage medium should generally be removed before testing using appropriate solvents, if necessary, without adverse effects upon the life of the specimens. E — 07 with as much economy as prudent. Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres Standards.

ASTM E Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests_百度文库

As a cautionary note, should localized yielding occur, signi? Threaded end specimens may prove difficult to align and failure often initiates at these stress concentrations when testing in the life regime of interest in this practice. Current edition approved Nov. Specimens should be cleaned prior to testing with solvent s non-injurious and non-detrimental to the zstm properties of the material in order to remove any surface oil?

E E e1 E All material variables, testing information, and procedures used should be reported so that correlation and reproducibility of astn may be attempted in a fashion that is considered reasonably good current test practice. It is beyond the scope of Practice E to extrapolate beyond this range or to extend this assumption to other materials systems that may be viscoelastic or viscoplastic at ambient test temperatures and within the frequency regime mentioned.


Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. e46696

Appendix X1 presents an example of a machining procedure that has been employed on some metals in an attempt to minimize the variability of machining and heat treatment upon fatigue life. The value of 1. This practice is limited to the fatigue testing of axial unnotched and notched specimens subjected to a constant amplitude, periodic forcing function in air at room temperature.

Soap Standards and Polish Standards.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Regardless of the machining, grinding, or astj method used, the? To do so would require the control or balance of what are often deemed nuisance variables; for example, hardness, cleanliness, grain size, composition, directionality, surface residual stress, surface?

In view of this fact, the method of preparation should be agreed upon prior to the beginning of the test program by both the originator and the user of the fatigue data to be generated.

In view of this, no maximum ratio of area grip to test section should apply. The following documents, although not directly referenced in the text, are considered important enough to be listed in this practice: Thus, when embarking on a program of this nature it is essential to de?

For cylindrical specimens, alignment should be checked by means of a trial test specimen with longitudinal strain gages placed at four equidistant locations around the minimum diameter.


This practice is not intended for application in axial fatigue tests of components or parts. The test forces should be monitored continuously in the early stage of the test and periodically, thereafter, to ensure that the desired force cycle is maintained. However, regardless of the nature of the forcing function, it should be reported sine, ramp, saw tooth, etc.

Electrical Standards and Magnetic Conductor Standards. E – 10 See all versions E E — 07 6. Corrosion Standards and Wear Standards.

Fatigue Standards and Fracture Standards

Fatigue Standards and Fracture Standards. Assurance that surface residual stresses are minimized can be achieved by careful control of the machining procedures.

Fatigue Standards and Fracture Standards ASTM’s fatigue and fracture standards provide the appropriate procedures for carrying out fatigue, fracture, and other related tests on specified materials. Since however, the environment can greatly in? The trial test specimen should be turned about its axis, installed, and checked for each of four orientations within the? W466-96 Copy Product Standards. E e1 E E Ea Ea Ee1 E Road Standards and Paving Standards.

Glass Standards and Ceramic Standards. E — 07 fatigue test the permanent deformation of the unbroken but tested specimens for example, percent change in cross-section area of test section should be reported. Search and Rescue Operations Standards.