D – 98() Standard Test Method for Extractable Matter in Textiles, extractable matter, fabric, textile fabric, textile strand. This standard is issued under the fixed designation D ; the number 1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D on Textiles. Find the most up-to-date version of ASTM D at Engineering

Competent statistical assistance is recommended for the investigation of bias. Note 1—Other standards for the determination of extractable matter in textiles made of specific fibers include: Option 1 uses heat and Soxhlet extraction apparatus. Option 3 uses either Option 1 or Option 2 extraction but provides for calculation of extractable matter from the loss in mass of the material due to the extraction rather than the extractable matter residue.

It is the responsibility of the user of atm standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Note 1-Other standards for the determination of extractable matter in textiles made of specific fibers have been published by ASTM: As the voice of the U. Option 1 uses heat and Soxhlet extraction apparatus.

Note 1—Other standards for the determination of extractable matter in textiles made of specific fibers include: See Note 2, 5. As a minimum, the two parties should take a group of test specimens which are as homogeneous asrm possible and which are from a lot of material of the type in question.

ASTM D – 98() Standard Test Method for Extractable Matter in Textiles

Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use.

Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. As a minimum, the two parties should take a group of test specimens which are as homogeneous as possible and which are from a lot of material of the type in question.

By mutual agreement other solvents may be used. See Sections 6 and 7. Option 2 uses room temperature and extraction funnels.

ASTM D2257 – 98(2012)

Option 3 uses either Option 1 or Option 2 extraction but provides for calculation of extractable matter from the loss in mass of the material due f2257 the extraction rather than the extractable matter residue.

Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. This test method may be awtm for acceptance testing of commercial shipments. Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health x2257 and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Please first verify your email before subscribing to alerts. This test method covers a procedure for determining the extractable material on most fibers, yarns, and fabrics. Add to Alert PDF. The test specimens should then be randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing.

Option 1 uses heat and Soxhlet extraction apparatus. The average results from the two laboratories should be compared using appropriate statistical analysis and a probability level chosen by the two parties before the testing begins. Your Alert Profile lists the documents that will be monitored. Please first verify your email before subscribing to alerts.

Option 2 uses room temperature and extraction funnels. Option 1 uses heat and Soxhlet extraction apparatus. Note 1 Other standards for the determination of extractable matter in textiles made of specific fibers include: Competent statistical assistance is recommended for the investigation of bias. Note 1—Other standards for the determination of extractable matter in textiles made of specific fibers include: You may delete a document from your Alert Profile at any time.

Your Alert Profile lists the documents that will be monitored. Standards Subsctiption may be the perfect solution. The average results from the two laboratories should be compared using appropriate statistical analysis and a probability level chosen by the two parties before the testing begins.

The test specimens should then be randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing. Please first log in with a verified email before subscribing to alerts.

This standard is also available to be included in Standards Subscriptions. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.