Apr 11 2020

Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby, Or on Contingency. Report. Post on Aug Views. Category: Documents. Downloads. Download. Third, Agamben’s reading in relation to Aristotle’s logic of potentiality. .. In “ Bartleby, or On Contingency,” which appeared with Deleuze’s text on Bartleby. establishment of the contingency of beings and events. However, the relationship . death, Agamben points to Bartleby as a hopeful figure of.

Author: Zolojora Sataxe
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 2 June 2016
Pages: 371
PDF File Size: 12.56 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.11 Mb
ISBN: 804-3-68668-416-3
Downloads: 31386
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kalkree

The falasifa were concerned with the principles by which the possible, existing in the mind of God, does or does not continency in the creative act.

If God has the potential to be, then he also has the potential to not be, which contradicts his eternity. On the writing tablet of the celestial scribe, the letter, the act of writing, marks the passage from potentiality to actuality, the occurrence of a contingency.

Howard Eiland and Michael W.

Remembrance, for Benjamin, challenges the irrevo- cability of the past, making both what happened and what did not possible again. Hence it does not even want what it desires; there is no reason for it want one thing rather than another. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Past Contingent The question of the autonomous existence of potentiality is ultimately that of contingency and human freedom. However, once potentiality is expelled from the human realm, it reappears in God.

After all, while Bartleby drives his employer to quit his premises and relocate his law firm, his peace is short lived. The fire does not burn the cotton itself; God establishes the coincidence of the case and the effect.

Or in other words, how can a blank writing tablet impress upon itself? Maimonides argued for the truth of creation ex nihilo in in Guide for the Perplexed. Aristotle and the Origins of Sovereignty In Homo Sacer, Agamben writes that the paradox of sovereignty, which refers to life by withdrawing from it, is witnessed most clearly in the problem of the relation of constituting power to constituted power.

What is this limit? To escape this dialectic, Agamben suggests, we need to reformulate completely the problem of constituent power and sever the nexus between means and ends.


Post navigation

It thinks agambsn own potentiality. Hence, the mind is not a thing, but a being of pure potential. If thought already had a form, like a tablet has a form, then it would appear in the intelligible object and thinking could not take place. To hold to non-Being is difficult and is the characteristic experience of nihilism.

Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby and the Potentiality of the Law. Notify me of new comments via email. Is it possible, in short, to attempt to say what seems impossible to say, that is: And if it thinks something, then that bartkeby is superior, because the thing would determine it. Remembrance is about potentiality.

Bartleby, when he decides to give up copying, moves passed this solution: Aristotle said the intellect was intelligible, but it cannot be intelligible in the way that other objects are because it is not a thing: In The Arcades Project, contingenc. He does not redeem what was, but to save what was not.

In this theological world, the category of possibility is destroyed: Traditionally, these problems are tempered by two principles. This, I will suggest, is precisely what draws Agamben to this scribe who has stopped writing.

Alone, and contingencyy, condemned to incarceration and death, Bartleby is an unlikely saviour.

Upon finding Bartleby still occupying his office, the narrator—after agambne return from the dead—descends the staircase and walks around the block, contemplating a series of equally unsatisfactory responses: In Essays critical and clinical.

It is the oldness of the letter to which Paul opposes the newness of Spirit: The ink is thought itself.

Will is what brings order to chaotic potential: In his Theses on the Philosophy of History—which serves as a critique of a teleological view of history that was prepared to build its monuments on the graves of the forgotten—Benjamin counter- poses the agwmben of memory to the homogenous and empty time presupposed by agamhen of progress Benjamin The falasifain contrast, remained true to Aristotle: Central to bartlebh principle of conditioned necessity is whether that which is happening is capable of not happening or of happening otherwiseand thus it is closely linked to the question of the status of adynamia in the passage to actuality.


Given the complexity of his argument, however, I will begin by outlining his attempt to re- think modality, which, like much of his critique of Western politics, proceeds by way of a critical re-reading of Aristotle.

A commentary on the letter to the Romans. Email required Address never made public. You are commenting using your WordPress. It is this supremacy of will over potentiality that Contngency throws in question. If we are to confront the state of exception that has become the norm and live a life of possibility, it is on these resources that we must draw.

University of Minnesota Press.

Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby, Or on Contingency – [PDF Document]

The formula is repeated so often that it ruins any relation between absolute and ordered potential. When Ibn Arabi worked out his The Illuminations of Meccahe wrote a chapter on the science of letters, about their hierarchy and relations to divine names. The image is ambiguous, and this ambiguity no doubt contributed to its widespread success.

Creation was understood according to the model of thinking; every act of thinking is an act of intelligence, and every act of intelligence is a creation that lets something be. Duns Scotus says that if there is a contradiction between two actual realities, being P and not-being P, nothing keeps a thing from being actual and maintaining its potential to not be or be otherwise. And finally, there is a complete potentiality that belongs to someone who has full knowledge of writing in the moment that they are not writing.

This is why in the end, the walled courtyard is not a sad place. If potentiality were only ever the potential to do or be something, we would never experience as potentiality—it would only exist in the actuality it is realized in.

First, there is a potentiality which he calls material which is like a child who cannot now, but will someday, be able to write.